IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 343 CWP-2932-2002 Jitender Pal Singh CWP-3478-2009 (O&M) Sarbjit Singh Bajwa and others vs. State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Ayush Gupta, Advocate Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Arjun P. Atma Ram, Advocate for respondent Nos.3, 5, 6. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petitions private respondents to the post of Labour Inspector Grade 2. The Division Bench while admitting the petition on 15.02.2002 had restrained the Sta 3. Learned State counsel submits that during the interregnum petitioners have unable to refut 4. D in case lis still subsists 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. 28.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.04.2025 2002 (O&M) Jitender Pal Singh and another vs. State of Punjab 2009 (O&M) Sarbjit Singh Bajwa and others vs. State of Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. DS Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ayush Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Arjun P. Atma Ram, Advocate for respondent Nos.3, 5, 6. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petitions private respondents to the post of Labour Inspector Grade The Division Bench while admitting the petition on 15.02.2002 had restrained the State of Punjab from allowing the said respondents to join. Learned State counsel submits that during the interregnum have also retired from service, a fact which their learned counsel te. Disposed of reserving the petitioner still subsists. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.04.2025 f Punjab and others Sarbjit Singh Bajwa and others vs. State of Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY with for the petitioners in CWP-2932-2002 Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for for the petitioners in CWP-3478-2009. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Arjun P. Atma Ram, Advocate for respondent Nos.3, 5, 6. Prayer made in the present petitions is for quashing the selection of private respondents to the post of Labour Inspector Grade-I. The Division Bench while admitting the petition on 15.02.2002 had te of Punjab from allowing the said respondents to join. Learned State counsel submits that during the interregnum a fact which their learned counsel was titioners with a liberty to get it revived Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2002. 2009. for quashing the selection of The Division Bench while admitting the petition on 15.02.2002 had Learned State counsel submits that during the interregnum, was with a liberty to get it revived ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.28 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document