IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 FAO-M-11-2021 Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 Ramandeep Kaur ...Appellant Versus Varinder Singh ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- None for the appellant. ***** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (ORAL) 1. On 14.10.2022, following order was passed:- “As per office report, notice to respondent could not be issued for want of process fee. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to deposit the process fee and thereafter, notice to respondent be issued for 12.5.2023. 2. Position remained the same when the case was taken up on 12.05.2023 and following order was passed on the said date:- “As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondent, as process fee has not been deposited. Let process fee be deposited within one week from today. Pursuant thereto, notice be issued to the respondent for 20.09.2023. Learned counsel for the appellant be notified of this order” 3. Today again, position is not different. As per office report, the appellant has not taken steps to deposit the process fee. She also remains unrepresented. HARISH KUMAR 2025.05.28 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment FAO-M-11-2021 -2- 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. ( ANIL KSHETARPAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 27, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.05.28 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment