1 934-CP-849-23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 849 OF 2023 IN WP/3726/2001 GANGADHAR BHIKAJI MEHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Kunal Arvind Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/State ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.J. DATE : 05th AUGUST, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned AGP makes statement that in the order of this Court itself it is observed that property of the petitioner is released, and therefore, it is not necessary to issue notification under Section 127(2) of the Maharashtra Regional And Town Planning Act, 1966, as the case of the petitioner is prior to the amendment. 2. Faced with this situation, learned advocate for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to not press the contempt petition. 3. Permission granted. Contempt petition is disposed of as not pressed. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2025:BHC-AUG:20752-DB