Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32021 (RAJ)

HIRA DEVI W/O LATE SHRI SRIRAM KISHORE SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7094/2019 · 2025-08-25

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33563] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7094/2019 Hira Devi W/o Late Shri Sriram Kishore Sharma, R/o Mundiyaramsar, At Present R/o Bassi Nagaan, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. 2. Madho Lal S/o Late Shri Roop Narayan, R/o Village Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 3. Braj Mohan S/o Shri Rameshwar, R/o Village Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 4. Hari Shankar S/o Shri Rameshwar, R/o Village Dhankaya, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 5. Babu Lal S/o Shri Rameshwar, R/o Village Panchyawal, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 6. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Sriniwas, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 7. Suman W/o Late Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 8. Deepak S/o Late Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 9. Rahul S/o Late Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 10. Anil S/o Late Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 11. Shyam Sunder S/o Late Shri Ramanand, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 12. Madan Mohan S/o Late Shri Ramanand, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 13. Kamlesh S/o Late Shri Uma Shankar, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. 14. Vimla Devi W/o Late Shri Uma Shanker, R/o Mundiyaramsar, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:33563] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7094/2019] For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 25/08/2025 1. Today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner even in second round. 2. It seems that the petitioner has lost his interest in the present petition. 3. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /33