CR-1929-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (134) CR-1929-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: - 27.03.2025 Bishan Das ....Petitioner Versus Sawan Singh (deceased) through his LRs/representatives .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 25.04.2023 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, vide which the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for the ejectment of the petitioner- tenant, has been allowed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 28.02.2025 vide which the appeal filed by the petitioner-tenant has also been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, on instructions from his client, has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-1929-2025 (O&M) -2- petitioner is a tenant in the premises for the last more than 25 years. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the following observations/directions:- (i) The petitioner would be permitted to occupy the premises till 27.05.2025, subject to the conditions mentioned hereinafter and would vacate the premises and hand over the keys of the premises to the respondent on or before 27.05.2025. (ii) The petitioner would file an undertaking on the above-said aspect before the Executing Court within a period of two weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not submit the said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the landlords to seek immediate possession of the premises in question from the petitioner by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of Courts Act. 5. In view of what has been observed above, the present revision petition is disposed of. ( VIKAS BAHL ) March 27, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement