Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32013 (RAJ)

ARJUN LAL SON OF CHHOTU v. KALURAM SON OF CHHOTU

CR/248/2022 · 2025-08-25

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33500] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 248/2022 1. Arjun Lal Son Of Chhotu, Resident Of Dhani Sejawali Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Ram Naresh Son Of Jagdish Prasad, Resident Of Kaniwal Krashi Farm Sherpura, Tehsil Shahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Om Prakash Son Of Jagdish Prasad, Resident Of Kaniwal Krashi Farm Sherpura, Tehsil Shahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Kaluram Son Of Chhotu, Resident Of Dhani Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Sadhuram Son Of Chhotu, Resident Of Dhani Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Surajmal Son Of Chhotu, Resident Of Dhani Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Kesri Wife Of Hanuman Sahai, Resident Of Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Mahaveer Son Of Hanuman, Resident Of Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Radheyshyam Son Of Hanuman, Resident Of Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Sita Ram Son Of Hanuman, Resident Of Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 8. Mewa Devi Daughter Of Hanuman Wife Of Hari Ram, Resident Of Dhani Jajma Wali, Bisangarh, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.). 9. Sub-Registrar Officer, Sahapura, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) 10. Tehsildar Sahapura, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur. 11. Prabhudayal Son Of Chhotu, Resident Of Dhani Nae Kothi, Tan Khori, Tehsil Sahapura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:33500] (2 of 2) [CR-248/2022] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. M. Ranjan, Senior Counsel with Mr. Rohan Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None Present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 25/08/2025 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the fact that the impugned order was passed by the trial court in the year 2022 and thereafter about 3 years have been elapsed and no stay is operating in favour of the petitioners, without interfering with the impugned order, I dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the objections, as raised in this petition, before the trial court at the appropriate stage of trial. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /47