APHC010469312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 24235 of 2024 Between: 1. CALVARY TEMPLE FOUNDATION, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON P.L. ENOCH, S/O P.L. LAZARUS, AGE 54 YRS, R/O SY.NO.77, HYDERNAGAR, HAFEEZPETA, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN PS, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, KAKINADA URBAN MANDAL, KAKINADA. 7. SRI DASARI YACOB, S/O MOSES, AGE 60 YRS, R/O FLAT NO.501, LINGAMURTHY CENTRAL, MAIN ROAD VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declare the proceedings 2ndof the 2 respondent in Ref.No.Coordn.6/CBCNC/214/2024, dt 14.10.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural Justice and without having power jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. PONNADA SREE VYAS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Letter addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner transpires that the Writ Petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to conduct prayers in the schedule property and the petitioner informed the learned counsel to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, Writ Petition was listed under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. However, basing upon letter addressed to the Registry, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.08.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24235 of 2024 Date: 06.08.2025 siva