KARAN SHARMA @ VIPIN KAUSHAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CRM-M/28633/2024 · 2025-05-20
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32006 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32006 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-28633-2024 -1- 309/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28633-2024 Date of Decision:20.05.2025 Karan Sharma @ Vipin Kaushal and another …Petitioners vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another …Respondents
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Rohit Mahajan, Advocate for petitioners No.1 and 2. Mr. Vrishketu, Advocate for petitioner No.3. Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Addl. P.P. for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Deepal Jaglan, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 94, dated 22.05.2023, registered under Sections 420,120-B of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, Police Station Sector-39, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 26.03.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-2). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh and got their statements recorded. HEMLATA 2025.05.22 05:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-28633-2024 -2- Report dated 16.05.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6. Resultantly, FIR No. 94, dated 22.05.2023, registered under Sections 420, 120-B of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, Police Station Sector-39, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-2) are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 20.05.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.05.22 05:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document