Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32006 (AP)

Angati Satish Kumar v. The commissioner of Police

WP/24088/2025 · 2025-09-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010469802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 24088/2025 Between: 1. ANGATI SATISH KUMAR, S/O.RAMU, 28 YEARS, D.NO.14-15-1/1, RAMAJOGIPETA OPP-SAIBABA TEMPLE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POLICE COMMISSIONERATE VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MAHILA POLICE STATION YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAHILA POLICE STATION YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINICIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent police particularly 2 and 3 respondents calling the petitioners and his old aged parents to the police station continuously by pressuring them to settle the dispute in respect of the maintenance in nature of permanent alimony with the petitioner wife as the matter is sub-judicate in the court proceedings are illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India. Consequently to direct the Respondent Police R2 and R3 not to interfere the petitioners personal liberty-nor harass the petitioner and his old age person and not implicate any false case against the innocent women against her fundamental rights in the interest of the justice. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANDURI RAMAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent police particularly respondents 2 and 3 calling the petitioners and his old aged parents to the police station continuously by pressuring them to settle the dispute in respect of the maintenance in nature of permanent alimony with the petitioner wife as the matter is sub-judicate in the court proceedings are illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India. Consequently to direct the Respondent Police R2 and R3 not to interfere the petitioners personal liberty-nor harass the petitioner and his old age person and not implicate any false case against the innocent women against her fundamental rights in the interest of the justice. ...” Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police. Perused the material on record. None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home placed on record the written instructions dated 07.09.2025 and would submit that basing on the complaint given by the wife of the Petitioner, respondent Police called the Petitioner only to the Police Station for preliminary enquiry and his aged parents were never called to the Police Station. It is a matrimonial issue and no crime is registered against him till date and requested to pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against him except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 24088 of 2025 12.09.2025 Mjl /*