Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32002 (JHR)

GOURI MAHTO v. ISHWAR MAHTO ALIAS MADAN MAHTO

C.M.P./1079/2022 · 2025-01-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1079 of 2022 1. Gouri Mahto, aged about 65 years 2. Bisheshwar Prasad Mahto @ Visheshwar Mahto, aged about 45 years 3. Binay Mahto, aged about 40 years, all sons of late Mahavir Mahto, resident of village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, Distt.- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) … Petitioners -Versus- 1. Ishwar Mahto @ Madan Mahto, son of Late Rangu Mahto, resident of village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribagh 2. Mahabir Mahto, son of Late Bhangi Mahto 3. Vakil Prasad Mehta, son of Late Sarju Mahto 4. Most. Tetri Devi, W/o Late Sona Mahto 5. Prem Prasad Mehta 6. Banshi Prasad Mehtra 7. Binod Prasad Sl. No.5 to 7, sons of Late Sona Mahto, all resident of Village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribagh … Opposite Parties With C.M.P. No. 48 of 2023 1. Gouri Mahto, aged about 65 years 2. Bisheshwar Prasad Mahto @ Visheshwar Prasad Mahto @ Bisheshwar Prasad Mehta, aged about 45 years 3. Binay Mahto, aged about 40 years, all sons of late Mahavir Mahto, resident of village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, Distt.- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) … Petitioners -Versus- 1. Ishwar Mahto @ Madan Mahto, son of Late Rangu Mahto, resident of village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribagh 2. Mahabir Mahto, son of Late Bhangi Mahto 3. Vakil Prasad Mehta, son of Late Sarju Mahto 4. Most. Tetri Devi, W/o Late Sona Mahto 5. Prem Prasad Mehta 6. Banshi Prasad Mehtra 7. Binod Prasad Sl. No.5 to 7, sons of Late Sona Mahto, All resident of village- Asia, P.O. & P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribagh … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Faisal Khan, Advocate (In both cases) For the Opposite Parties : ----- -1- C.M.P. No. 1079 of 2022 With C.M.P. No. 48 of 2023 06/15.01.2025 Both the cases are arising out of same impugned order. 2. Mr. Faisal Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the cases seeks permission to withdraw these petitions with liberty to take recourse under the law. 3. In view of his such submission, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/ -2- C.M.P. No. 1079 of 2022 With C.M.P. No. 48 of 2023