1 APHC010469202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 23858/2025 Between: 1. M/S P.P. RAJU AND COMPANY,, CIVIL CONTRACTORS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER PENMATCHA PEDDI RAJU, S/O.P SUPRA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. FLAT NO. 402, SRI SAIRAM ESTATES, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, PINCODE- 500073. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC), VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 5. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, APEWIDC, VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APEWIDC CIRCLE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APEWIDC DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, APCFSS, 3RD FLOOR, NIDHI BHAVAN, BEHIND APIIC BUILDING, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Maria Rani Makkena, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. Modapothula Sumalatha, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning. 2. Ms. Maria Rani Makkena, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the amounts claimed by the Writ Petitioner have been duly settled by the Respondents and therefore, no further consideration is necessary in this Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:15.10.2025 Vns