Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 320 (MAN)

Laishram Shatpa Singh v. Union of India and 4 Others

WP(C)/883/2025 · 2026-07-12

Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) No. 883 of 2025 Contd.../- IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 883 of 2025 Laishram Shatpa Singh, aged about 62 years, S/o (L) L. Nanao Singh of Khangabok Awang Leikai, Part – I, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Union of India represented by the Director, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Manipur having its office at RIMS Complex, Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur. 2. The Medical Superintendent, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, Imphal, RIMS Complex, Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur. 3. The Deputy Director (Admn.), Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, RIMS Complex, Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Thoubal, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Thoubal Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH For the petitioner :: XXX For the respondents :: Mr. Shyam Sharma, GA Date of Hearing & order :: 13-07-2026 IN. 41 SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.07.14 13:42:56 +05'30' WP(C) No. 883 of 2025 Contd.../- O R D E R [1] Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appeared on behalf of the respondents No. 4 and 5. None appeared either on behalf of the petitioner or respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. [2] In the present case, the petitioner is claiming an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- (rupees ten lakh) as a Gratuity and another Rs. 8,00,000/- (rupees eight lakh) on account of Unutilized Leave Encashment. By an order dated 07-05-2026 passed by this court in the present writ petition, this matter was referred for mediation for exploring the possibility of an amicable settlement. After rounds of mediation proceedings, the Mediator submitted a report dated 23-06-2025 and the said report clearly indicated that the parties have amicably reached a settlement. A scanned copy of the Mediation Report is reproduced hereunder -2- WP(C) No. 883 of 2025 Contd.../- -3- WP(C) No. 883 of 2025 Contd.../- [3] On perusal of the said Mediation Report, it is clearly revealed that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition has been granted and the dispute has been amicably settled. In view of the above, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of in terms of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties as reproduced hereinabove. JUDGE Devananda -4-