Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31996 (JHR)

JOGENDRA SINGH v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WPC/7608/2023 · 2025-02-20

Deepak Roshan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7608 of 2023 --------- 1. Joginder Singh @ Jogendra Singh, aged about 42 years, son of Pritpal Singh, resident of HIT B-14, MadhavBagh Colony, Mango, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 2. DharamveerSingh, aged about 44 years, son of Late Ajit Singh, resident of 17 CH Area, East Bistupur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. …… Petitioners Versus 1. Punjab National Bank (E-United Bank of India), SASTRA, Ranchi South, having registered office at 5th Floor, Nile Complex, H.B. Road, Kantatoli, P.O. Kokar, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. 2. Punjab National Bank (E-United Bank of India), Bistupur, R-Road, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Saraikella-Kharsawan, P.O. and P.S. Saraikella, District-Saraikella-Kharsawan. 4. The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi, having registered office at Debt Recovery Tribunal, Reserve Bank of India Building, Kutchary Road, P.O. – G.P.O., P.S. Lalpur, District Ranchi. 5. Chandra Kishor Singhania, son of Satya Narayan Singhania, resident of Alankar, First Floor, Station Road, Taparia Complex,P.O. and P.S. Jugsalai, District East Singhbhum. ……… Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Saman Ahmad, Advocate For State : Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, A.C. to AAG-III For Respondent- Bank : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Sumeet Kumar Gadodia, Advocate, Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Prakhar Harit, Advocate /24.02.2025 The instant writ application has been listed today in view of the fact that due to typographical error in para-44, the cost amount of Rs. 20,000/- has been typed as Ten Thousand in words; as such Ten Thousand (in words) which is written in paragraph no.44, be read as Twenty Thousand only. 2. Let this order be treated as part of the main order dated 20.02.2025. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/-