APHC010354142018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 16695/2018 Between: 1. B. BALAJI VARA PRASAD NAIK, S/O B THIPPA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O H.NO.I-117, NAKKALADINNE THANDA, BANGALORE ROAD, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 325. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, REP., BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) 2 APHC010469522017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 31609/2017 Between: 1. B.RAMANUJULU NAIK, S/O. GOPAL NAIK, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO. II-30-4-A, SV COLONY, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. K.REDDEPPA,, S/O. K.LAKSHMANA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. THUMALA THANDA VEMPALLE POST, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DIST. 3. M.SUNIL NAIK, S/O. M.SANKAR NAIK, 31 YRS., R/O. RAMANAIK THANDA, MUSALIKUNTA POST, PEDDAMANDYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NOS.16695 OF 2018 AND 31609 OF 2017 COMMON ORDER: Ms.B.Mounika, learned counsel representing Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners in both cases would submit that writ petitioners are not coming forward to give instructions to prosecute the writ petitions. 2. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC in both cases is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in both the Writ Petitions shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.09.2025 Pmk 5 45 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION Nos.16695 OF 2018 and 31609 of 2017 Date: 04.09.2025 Pmk