Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3199 (KAR)

SHRI. VENKATESH SANNAKKINAVAR, v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

WP/101787/2024 · 2025-01-13

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:484 WP No. 101787 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 101787 OF 2024 (GM-CC) BETWEEN: SHRI VENKATESH SANNAKKINAVAR, S/O. CHANDRASEN SANNAKKINAVAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR LINEMAN, R/O. A/P. HARUGERI, TQ. RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI-591220. … PETITIONER (BY SRI ANAND L.SANDRIMANI AND SRI. SANTOSH B.RAWOOT, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HESCOM, CORPORATE OFFICE, NAVANAGAR, P.B. ROAD, HUBBALLI-580025. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), FUNCTION AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT, HESCOM, RAIBAG, TQ. RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI-591317. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.S.KAMATE, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATIONS DATED 05/11/2022, 30/11/2022 AND 05/09/2023 RESPECTIVELY AT ANNEXURES-G, H AND J, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.01.15 11:09:29 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:484 WP No. 101787 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The petitioner’s appointment to the post of Lineman was cancelled on the grounds that the appointment was obtained by producing a fraudulent Caste Certificate. The petitioner filed an appeal against the cancellation order, and the Appellate Authority granted an interim stay on the cancellation. 2. The petitioner submitted representations to the respondents requesting the release of his salary, arguing that since the cancellation order has been stayed, the salary should be released. However, the petitioner’s grievance is that these representations have not been considered. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submitted that the representations will be considered in accordance with the law if given reasonable time. 4. Therefore, the petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 05.11.2022, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:484 WP No. 101787 of 2024 30.11.2022, and 05.09.2023 (Annexures-‘G’, ‘H’, and ‘J’) within a period of two months from the receipt of this order. All contentions of the parties are kept open. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE RH CT:PA List No.: 4 Sl No.: 13