SHAMSHAD BEGUM v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1078/2025 · 2025-05-02
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3199 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3199 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1078/2025 CM No. 2566/2025
Shamshad Begum
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. N. Nadeem Bhat, Advocate
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (02.05.2025)
01. The petitioner is trying to play smart after having accepted the compensation for damage caused to the residential property in connection with construction of road from Dharam Kund to Shana Bhati in village Ashmar, tehsil Gool, district Ramban, which is said to have taken place way back in the year 2014-15 but now coming in the year 2025 with the present writ petition with a prayer for a ‘writ of mandamus’ unto the respondents No. 4 and 5 seeking compensation to the damaged house of the petitioner un-mentioned in the writ petition as to in which khasra number and in which village the same is situated and also seeking re- Serial No. 116
2 WP(C) No. 1078/2025
assessment and re-evaluation of the structure and residential house of the petitioner as per market value meaning thereby the assessment had taken place at first instance for the sake of payment and the petitioner is now seeking re-assessment. The two reliefs are self contradictory to each other.
02. The writ petition is nothing but seriously misconceived which is accordingly, dismissed.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
02.05.2025
SUNIL