W.P.(CRL) 3762/2024 1 $~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3762/2024 DEEPAK NANDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Sarthak Maggon, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, Addl. SC for State with SI Priyanka Saini, PS Bindapur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 11.09.2025 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India for passing orders/directions as well as issuance of writs of certiorari or mandamus to the respondents, thereby allowing premature release of the petitioner on the sentence already undergone by him. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has made various representations to the respondent for release of petitioner, which have, till date not been decided by the respondent. 3. Mr. Amol Sinha, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State submits that such representations are not maintainable as per prevalent Rules. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner will be sufficiently met in case his representation is considered by the authority concerned, including on grounds of its This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:14:22 W.P.(CRL) 3762/2024 2 maintainability. To the same, learned Addl. Standing Counsel has no objection and he submits that the representation can be considered, including with regard to its maintainability by the authority expeditiously. 5. In view of aforesaid, let fresh representation be made by the petitioner within a period of one week from today to the respondent and the respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of moving representation. 6. Needless to say, all questions raised in the present petition are left open, with liberty to petitioner to raise those again, if need so arises. 7. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J MANOJ JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 11, 2025/ck/shs This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:14:22