1 2025:CGHC:31076 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3450 of 2025 1 - Ravi Shankar Bhashkar S/o Lal Das Bhashkar Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 7 Pandariya, Tehsil - Pandariya, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Urban Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Nagar Palika Parishad Through Chief Municipal Officer, Pandariya, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 07/07/2025 1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):- (I) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the impugned notice dated 19.02.2024 (Annexure P/7) and notice dated 18.06.2025 (Annexure P/9) in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitoner has possessde land bearing Khasra No. 733/1,0.02 dismil for over 40 years and built a kaccha house in 2006. Though the land is recorded in Krishna Raj Singh’s name in the year 1954-55, the petitioner claims that it was given to him, supported by affidavits 2 from the owner and his son. He submitted documents like electricity connection, tax receipts and voter IDs and runs a tyre repair business. Despite this, eviction notice were issued by Respondent No. 2, the petitioner seeks protection from eviction, recognition of his occupation and possible regularization of his possession. In respect of notice issued by the respondent No.2, the petitioner has filed replied and filed objection dated 21.02.2024 and 24.06.2025 (Annexure P/8 to Annexure P/9) which may also be decided. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to decide his objection, she is having no objection to the limited prayer and it will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondent-authorities to consider/decide the reply/objection (Annexure P/8 to P/10) of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. If it is found that the petitioner is landless, necessary steps be taken for rehabilitation of the petitioner in accordance with law. 6. Till the objection of the petitioner is decided, no coercive shall be taken against the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.07.09 14:04:12 +0530