HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3478 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3/District Inspector of Schools, Hamirpur to pay the entire retiral dues including arrears of pension as well as regular pension, amount of G.P.F., amount of group insurance, leave encashment, difference of the arrears of salary of the post of officiating Principal e.t.c. to the petitioner forthwith within a period to the specified by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3/District Inspector of Schools, Hamirpur to decide the representation of the petitioner which is moved by the petitioner for payment of entire retiral dues including arrears of pension as well as regular pension, amount of G.P.F., amount of group insurance, leave encashment, difference of the arrears of salary of the post of officiating Principal e.t.c. within a period to the specified by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 08.02.2024, which is pending before respondent no.3, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shesh Kumar Srivastava Narendra Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Dev Kaushik holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within fifteen days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 15, 2025 Pratima WRIA No. 3478 of 2024 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad