Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31982 (JHR)

NAVIN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/7698/2023 · 2025-04-15

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11398 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.7698 of 2023 ------ Navin Kumar Singh son of Late Birendra Prasad Singh, resident of Village Marwaniya, P.O. Marwaniya, P.S. Ramna, District Garhwa (Jharkhand)-822128 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. The Additional Commissioner, Garhwa cum Arbitrator, NHAI, having its office at Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 4. The Land Reform Deputy Collector, Garhwa, having its office at Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 5. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Garhwa, having its office at Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 6. The Circle officer, Ramna, having its office at Ramna, P.O. Ramna, P.S, Ramna, District Garhwa, Jharkhand 7. The Regional Officer, NHAI, having its office at C-129, Vidyalaya Marg, Ashok Nagar, P.O. Ashok Nagar, Road No.2, P.S. Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 8. The Project Director, NHAI, Garhwa, having its office at Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Ms. Adya Mishra, Advocate Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate For the NHAI : Ms. Sweety Topno, Advocate Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate ------ Order No.06 / Dated : 15.04.2025 Learned counsel on behalf of petitioner submits that similar matter has been decided by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and therefore, the petitioner does not intend to pursue with the writ petition. Under the circumstance, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Interlocutory Application, if any, is disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit