Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.4706 of 2025 1) Rahul Sethi ..... Petitioners 2) Sunil Sethi Represented By Adv. - Brahmananda Tripathy -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC BLAPL No.4976 of 2025 Tankadhar Ojha @ Tuku Ojha ..... Petitioners Represented By Adv. - Brahmananda Tripathy -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 30.05.2025 Order No. 02. 1. These matters are taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Since, both the bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 have arisen out of one case vide C.T Case No.403 of 2025 in connection with Capital P.S. Case No.101 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Bhubaneswar, then both the bail Page 2 of 3. applications are taken up together analogously for their final disposal through this common order. 3. The petitioners are in jail custody since 15.03.2025 having been implicated under Sections 126(2)/296/109/118(1)/ 303(2)/324(4)/351(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023 on the allegation of attempting to commit murder of the victim on dated 13.03.2025 at about 12.30 PM when the victim was sitting with his friends near Suryanagar, Durgamandap Basti. 4. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 5. It appears from the rejection order passed by the learned 4th Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar that, the present health condition of the victim is stable and normal. 6. When substantial parts of the investigation of the case has already been completed and when the present health condition of the victim is stable and normal and there is no threat to the life of the victim for his injuries, then, at this juncture, instead of rejecting the bail applications of the petitioners, it is felt proper to allow them (petitioners) to go on bail with stringent conditions looking to the future safety and security of the victims and his family members. 7. Hence, both the bail applications filed by the petitioners are allowed. 8. They (petitioners) are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court in seisin over the case with conditions that :- Page 3 of 3. (i) They (petitioners) shall not involve with similar nature of crime in future. (ii) They (petitioners) shall appear before the court personally on each date of adjournment of the case. (iii) They (petitioners) shall not terrorize, coerce, influence or threat to the victim and his family members either directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever at any stage of the trial of the case. But, in case of their failure to comply any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned trial court is authorized to cancel their respective bail orders outrightly without seeking any permission from this Court for the same. 9. Accordingly, both the bail applications filed by the petitioners are disposed of finally. 10. Grant urgent certified copy of this order to the petitioners on proper application. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Vacation Judge Rati Ranjan Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India. Date: 01-Jun-2025 14:08:16