2025:JHHC:15753 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1094 of 2023 ---- Sunami Samad, aged about 45 years, W/o Late Pratap Singh Smamd r/o Nayak Mahulla P.O. Hatia P.S. Jagrnathpur, District-Ranchi …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. V.K. Gupta, Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Hatia, P.O & P.S. Jagernathpur, District-Ranchi 2. Sri Ajay Kumar, Senior Divisional Personal Officer, South Eastern Railway, Hatia, P.O & P.S. Jagernathpur, District-Ranchi 3. Sri Avanish, Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Eastern Railway Hatia, P.O & P.S. Jagernath District-Ranchi 4. Anup Lal Kisko Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, C.A.B Ranchi, Atmaram Bhawn, Radhyshyam Lane Main Road, P.O & P.S. Sadar, District-Ranchi 5. The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Parwez Ahmad Khan, Adv. For the O.Ps : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv. : Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI & Mrs. Nitu Sinha, CGC ---- 07/Dated: 13th June, 2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present contempt case has been filed for non-compliance of the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.7317 of 2019. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the Opposite Party-LIC that the claim has been processed and amounting to Rs.7,39,480/- (₹ Seven Lakh Thirty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Eighty) has already been credited in the Bank Account of the petitioner on 14.05.2025. 4. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has no instruction regarding the same. 5. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the opposite party, the instant contempt case is hereby disposed of reserving liberty with the petitioner to work out her further remedy, if any, in accordance with law. 6. It is also clarified that if the claim amount has not been credited then the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh application. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty/Raja/- Uploaded