DEEPAK AGARWAL S/O GURUDAYAL AGARWAL v. SMT. BINDIYA KUMARI VERMA W/O DEEPAK AGARWAL D/O LATE SAMBHU DAYAL VERMA
CMA/4416/2024 · 2025-06-30
Anand Sharma, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23834-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4416/2024 Deepak Agarwal S/o Gurudayal Agarwal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of 245, Vikram Chowk, Ladpura, Gulabbari Kota(Rajasthan). ----Appellant Versus Smt. Bindiya Kumari Verma W/o Deepak Agarwal D/o Late Sambhu Dayal Verma, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of House No 100, Beed Ke Balaji, Residential Colony, Bapu Nagar, Kunhadi Kota(Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 30/06/2025 On 28.01.2025, the Coordinate Bench of this Court passed the following order:-
“Notice of motion for 28.03.2025, subject to payment of Rs.15,000/- as litigation expenses to respondent-wife. Amount to be deposited with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court within four weeks. Record of the court below be requisitioned. In the meantime, operation of the impugned judgment and decree dated 09.07.2024 is stayed.” As per the office report, the appellant has not deposited the demand draft of Rs.15,000/- before this Court as litigation expenses. Today, none appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the matter even in the second round.
[2025:RJ-JP:23834-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-4416/2024] In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution as well as for non-compliance of the order dated
28.01.2025. Record of the court below be sent back.
(ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /32