APHC010467452024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4130/2024 Between: 1. SRI SRI VIGNESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, FIRM NO. 169 OF 2004, F. NO. 25/27 SANJEEV NAGAR, NANDYAL - 518501 REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V. RAMANJANEYA REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI J NIVAS I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 01.04.2024 passed in W.P. No. 5562 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 01.04.2024 passed in W.P. No. 5562 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Implead the proposed Respondent No. 3 as Respondent No. 3 in C.C. No. 4130 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: ORDER On the last occasion, learned counsel for respondents reported compliance. Whereas, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for respondents that there was compliance of the orders, this Contempt Case may be closed leaving it open to the petitioner to move appropriation application in case he feels that there is contempt of court. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. The petitioner, if he feels that there is still contempt of Court, he is at liberty to move appropriate application. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR