- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1872 MFA No. 1687 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1687 OF 2014(MV-D) BETWEEN: SRI. K. M. DORESWAMY, S/O. SRI. MARIYA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT JANNAPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATI TALUK-577 301. SHIMOGA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI B.MOHAN KUMAR …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGARAJ D.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUDHIR KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. VENDA MARADAMMA, W/O LATE PARASHURAMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, C/O SRI K. SADASHIVA S/O SRI KUPPU GOUNDER, R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SHIMOGA TALUK - 577 201. 2. SRI. SUBRAMANI S/O SRI PERUMALA GOUNDER,, C/O SRI K.M. DORESWAMY JANNAPURA BHADRAVATHI TALUK-577 301.. Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1872 MFA No. 1687 of 2014 (NOW HIS ADDRESS IS NOT KNOWN AND HE IS NOT RESIDING IN THE C/O ADDRESS SINCE MORE THAN 10 YEARS) 3. SMT. VELLIYAMMA, W/O. SRI VELLE GOUNDER, MAJOR, MALPADI SOTHAPAKAM, ANDAVASU TALUK, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT TAMIL NADU. …RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED; NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT, V/O. DATED 02.08.2019) THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED30.12.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.1056/06 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT AND ADDITIONAL MACT-II, SHIVAMOGGA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.2,15,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% FROM DATE OF PETITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on appellant's side on call. On 06.01.2025 following order was passed: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1872 MFA No. 1687 of 2014 "Sri.Narendra Kumar representing Sri.Nagaraj.D learned counsel on record for the appellant seeks time. The appeal is of the year 2014. However, to accommodate, the matter is adjourned. List on 17.01.2025. In case the appellant fails to submit his contentions on that day, the appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution." Even though such an order was passed, the appellant did not chose to pursue the matter. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43