Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31967 (AP)

A E PALANI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/24258/2024 · 2025-07-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010468462024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 24258 OF 2024 Between: 1. A E PALANI, s/o Elumalai Modali Age 55 years, Occ Weaver R/oD.No.1/19, Kota Street Narayanavanam Village and Mandal Tirupathi Dist. 2. R.M.Manohar, S/o R.Muragesa Modali Age 51 years, Occ Weaver R/o D.No.l-181/B, Kota Street Narayanavanam Village and Mandal, Tirupathi Dist. 3. S.Peri Swamy, S/o Kailasam Modali Age 57 years, Occ Weaver R/o D.NO.1-119, Kota Street Narayanavanam Village and Mandal Tirupathi Dist. 4. R.Delhi Kumar, S/o R.lstalingam Modali Age 56 years, Occ Weaver R/o D.N.1-25, Kota Street Narayanavanam Village and Mandal Tirupathi Dist. ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, rep.by its Principle Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. 2. The District Collector, Tirupathi Dist, at Tirupathi. 3. The Project Director, District Rural Development Authority (DRDA) Near RASS, New Balaji Colony, Tirupathi Town, Tirupathi Dist. 4. The Assistant Director, Handlooms AND Textiles B/s Raythu Bazar, Annamayya Circle Tirupathi Town, Tirupathi Dist. 5. The Mandal Parashid Development Officer MPDO, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupathi Dist. 2 6. The Welfare Assistant, Gramasachivalayam, Narayanavanam Village Tirupathi Dist. 7. K N Murugan, S/o K.Nagappa Modali Age 50 years, Occ Agriculture R/o H.No. 1-190-49, Rathnangi Kota Street Narayanavanam Village and Mandal Tirupathi Dist. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: T V P SAI VIHARI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents:HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP Counsel for the Respondents:M VENKATA SUBBA RAO(SC FOR AP TEXTILE DC) Counsel for the Respondents:Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Sk. Rafi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri T.V.P,. Sai Vihari, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners; Sri M. Hari Babu, learned Standing Counsel for SERP and Sri T. Anvesh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudheer, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. 2. Sri M. Hari Babu, learned Standing Counsel for SERP has placed on record the material indicating that the Writ Petitioners are being paid pension after considering their explanations and after physically verifying the places where the Writ Petitioners are residing. 3. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of, as no further consideration is necessary. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 08.07.2025 JKS 3 47 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 24258 OF 2024 08.07.2025 JKS