1 2025:CGHC:31541 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7464 of 2025 1 - Sandeep Kumar Pawle S/o Sainath Singh, Aged About 36 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School Asanjhunjh, Block Premnagar, District Surajpur 497333 Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Tuleshwari Sahu Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School Asanjhunjh, Block- Premnagar, District Surajpur 497333 Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Deo Office, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer, Block Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Block- Premnagar District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.09 18:44:31 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 09/07/2025 1. By way of this writ petitions, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not joined at his transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, he will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still want to pursue his representation before the concerned authorities to redress his grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner is having any grievance, he may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 3 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stands disposed of. Sd/-Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok