[2025:RJ-JP:34525] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17335/2019 Mamta Kumari D/o Ran Singh, W/o Jitendra Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Kasimpura, Via Bagar, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla with Ms. Sunita Mehla & Mr. Nagendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/08/2025 1. Pursuant to order dated 22.03.2024 and 20.08.2025 passed by this Court, learned counsel for the respondents has taken instructions. 2. Both the learned counsel appearing for the parties are in agreement that the issue in hand has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10141/2021 (Raghunath Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 25.08.2021 in which following directions were given: "(25) The petitioner is directed to appear before the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jalore on 06.09.2021 along with his original certificate of 9th Senior Jump Rope [2025:RJ-JP:34525] (2 of 2) [CW-17335/2019] Championship, 2012-13, issued by the Jump Rope Federation of India. The respondent No.4, in turn, shall get the enquiry conducted in relation to such certificate and petitioner's entitlement on its basis, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks. (26) Needless to observe that if the respondents9 are of the view that petitioner cannot be considered as an outstanding sportsperson even according to the second certificate (9th Senior Jump Rope Championship, 2012-13), they shall pass a speaking order in accordance with law under intimation to the petitioner. Till such decision is taken, the petitioner shall be allowed to work. In case, the petitioner is found eligible on the basis of the second certificate, he shall be kept in service with all consequential benefits." 3. In the light of consensus between the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in view of aforesaid directions given in the case of Raghunath Ram (supra). (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/55