[2025:RJ-JP:19316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 524/2025 Vipul Jain, Company Secretary And Authorized, Representative Of Ujalaa Milk Producer Company Limited Plot No. 110, 111-A, R.K. Puram Kota, Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Kota, District Kota (Rajasthan) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station R.K. Puram, Kota (Rajasthan) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7006/2024 Anurag Parashar S/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Age 39 Years, R/o Subodh Nagar, Near Shiv Mandir, District Mau (Uttar Pradesh). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent 2. Shri Vipul Jain, Authorized Secretary Of Ujala Milk Producer Company Ltd. Address Plot No. 110, 111A, R K Puram, District Kota. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Gangwar (S.B. Cr.LMP No.524/2025) Ms. Lipi Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. Mr. Manvendra Singh Sekhawat, P.P. Mr. Sanjay Gangwar (S.B. Cr.LMP No.7006/2024) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/05/2025 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 524/2025 is filed for fair investigation and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7006/2024 is filed for quashing of FIR. In the instant matters learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that an FIR was lodged by the authorized signatory of [2025:RJ-JP:19316] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-524/2025] the firm in question. It is further submitted that the accused herein are employees of the firm, who have given their resignation which was duly accepted five months prior to the registration of the FIR. Further, it is submitted that along with the other co-accused, they have no role to play in the alleged offence and they are falsely implicated in the FIR. Furthermore, it is submitted that this Court, on erstwhile occasion has passed an interim order qua the petitioners. Lastly, it is apprised to this Court, that factual report in the instant matter is filed and the same reflects that outcome of the investigation will be submitted shortly before the concerned Court. Learned counsel for the State and complainant have submitted that there is an embezzlement of approximately Rs.46 lakhs. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court directs that petitioners, if aggrieved with the outcome of investigation, are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. Interim order is hereby made absolute. Therefore, no coercive action be taken qua the petitioners till outcome of the investigation is filed/submitted. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/69-70