Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3195 (GAU)

Sh. Bhuwan Kafle v. Sh. Dev Kumar @ Deb Kumar

I.A.(Civil)/119/2025 · 2026-05-06

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030004742025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/119/2025 Sh. Bhuwan Kafle S/o Rupa Devi (L), R/o Tuitha Veng, Kolasib, Mizoram VERSUS Sh. Dev Kumar @ Deb Kumar H/o Rupa Devi (L), R/o Kawnpui, Kolasib District, Mizoram - 796070 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr A.R. Malhotra Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Lalramenga In RFA/30/2025 Sh. Bhuwan Kafle S/o Rupa Devi (L) R/o Tuitha Veng Kolasib Mizoram VERSUS Sh. Dev Kumar @ Deb Kumar H/o Rupa Devi (L) R/o Kawnpui Kolasib District Mizoram - 796070 Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr A.R. Malhotra Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Lalramenga B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 07.05.2026 1. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, Mr. C. Tlanthianghlima is present. Learned counsel submits that the steps have been taken on the sole respondent by way of dasti and affidavit has also been filed. 2. Today, when the matter is called, Ms. Laltlanhlui, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the sole respondent and submits that they have no objection with regard to the prayer in the I.A. for condonation of delay. 3. The Court has gone through the reasons for delay set out in the application and find out that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant/appellant. 4. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay of 8 (eight) days in filing the connected RFA No. 30 of 2025 is hereby condoned and the application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant