NAGAR NIGAM, BHARATPUR v. CHANDRAKANT BANSAL S/O SHRI RAMDAYAL BANSAL
CR/316/2024 · 2025-05-16
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31945 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31945 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20759] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 316/2024 Nagar Nigam, Bharatpur, Bharatpur Through Commissioner, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Chandrakant Bansal S/o Shri Ramdayal Bansal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Bansal Sadan Anah Gate, Bharatpur Partner Of M/s R.d.v. Cinema Multiplex Agra Road, Bharatpur (Raj.).
2. Manju Bansal W/o Chandrakant Bansal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bansal Sadan Anah Gate, Bharatpur Partner Of M/s R.d.v. Cinema Multiplex Agra Road, Bharatpur (Raj.).
3. Neha Bansal W/o Shri Yatish Bansal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bansal Sadan Anah Gate, Bharatpur Partner Of M/s R.d.v. Cinema Multiplex Agra Road, Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.K. Moolchandani, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nikhlesh Katara, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order 16/05/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they had withdrawn the impugned tax assessment notice. So, the suit filed by the respondent(s) having not been maintainable, this revision petition has been rendered infructuous. Therefore, the civil revision petition stands disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /59