1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7243 of 2025 1 - Smt. Madhuri Pandey W/o Pandit Bhardwaj Aged About 48 Years Working on The Post Of Assistant Teacher (L.B.T.) Posted At Govt. Primary School - Uraonpara, Block- Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - District Education Officer Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.). 3 - Block Education Officer Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri AN Pandey, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 25.07. 202 5 1. The limited prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is for a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide pending representation of the petitioner which he has filed on 07.05.2025 and 16.05.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that matter pertains to promotion of the petitioner and available vacant posts in the schools were not displayed to her at the time of counseling and therefore she could not opt for appropriate place of her posting. She made her representations on 07.05.2025 and 16.05.2025 but the same has not Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.07.26 14:26:36 +0530 2 been considered and decided till date. Therefore the respondent No.2 may be directed the decide the same within reasonable time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that petitioner denied to opt the school at the time of counseling and therefore her request could not be considered. He further submits that the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the respondent No.2 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within stipulated time period. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case the respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order to respondent No.2 within a week. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder