IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CR-1780-2024 Date of Decision:17.07.2025 STEEL STRIP WHEELS LTD. ...PETITIONER VERSUS KLASSIC WHEELS (P) LTD. ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bikash Ghorai, Advocate and Mr. Vaibhav Goel, Advocate for the respondent. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that as the impugned order has been passed by the learned District Judge, instant revision petition is not maintainable and the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before this Court under Order 43, Rule 1, CPC. 2. Counsel seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application seeking exemption of the period spent before this Court while pursuing the instant revision petition. 17.07.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.07.21 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh