1 2025:CGHC:37704 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5213 of 2025 Upendra Kumar Singh S/o Purendra Kumar Singh, Aged About 26 Years R/o Kali Temple, Sonari East, Jamshedpur (Jharkhand). --- Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Police Station Old Bhilai, District Durg (Cg). --- Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. MCRC No. 5566 of 2025 Sukhbeer Singh S/o Satnam Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o M I G 09, Housing Board, Kailash Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg C.G. ---Applicant(s) Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Bhilai-3, Bhilai, District Durg C.G. --- Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anurag Jha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. 2 Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 31/07/2025 1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as they have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 110/2025, registered at Police Station Bhilai-3, District- Bhilai (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act. 2. The prosecution story in brief is that the complainant Durgesh Singh has made a complain on 20.03.2025 at about 23:32 that on 12.03.2025 he has received a message in his telegram account ******* from an unknown person namely Chaya P user ID @ Telpa5409 for work from home, and it was assured that he will get Rs. 800/- to Rs. 1200/- per day for giving review and ratings to the products, there was no joining fees was prescribed, a link was also provided him, the complainant has registered himself with the company Global and received bonus of Rs. 10,000/- in his account and after giving rates and review he has again received Rs. 5000/- in his company account, to withdraw this amount he has been directed to deposit Rs. 21,444/- in the account of another co-accused similarly he has been directed to deposit Rs. 35000/-, Rs. 15000/-, Rs. 50,000/-, Rs. 36422/- after that the complainant was directed to deposit Rs. 1,55,995/- which was deposited by him by his and his wife’s account, the complainant 3 has deposited Rs. 3,13,444/- in different accounts of accused person but again he was directed to deposit Rs. 5,00,000/- so he made a complaint in the police station Old Bhilai District- Durg (C.G.) and the police has registered the offence. 3. It was argued by the counsel for the applicants that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the the charge-sheet/complaint has been filed and the applicant namely Upendra Kumar Singh is in jail since 22.03.2025 and applicant namely Sukhbeer Singh is in jail since 01.04.2025. Hence, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicants. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submits that there are 145 transactions made by the applicants in a single day of lakhs of rupees. The charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court, therefore, they are not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegation levelled against the applicant and considering the statement of the counsel for the State, this Court is of the opinion that this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicants on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of applicants- Upendra Kumar Singh and Sukhbeer Singh involved in Crime No. 110/2025 under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS 4 and Section 66 D of IT Act at Police Station Bhilai-3, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, is rejected. 7. However, this Court hopes and trusts that the Trial Court shall make earnest endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously as soon as possible in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Madhurima