- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10783 WP No. 22599 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 22599 OF 2024 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN: AMIT. S. B. S/O SHIVANANDA BHAT AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 137, 10TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS 6TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH N.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE UNIVERISTY JNANA BHARATHI, BENGALURU – 560 056. REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, JNANABHARATHI BENGALURU – 560 056. 3. VIJAYA DEGREE COLLEGE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL, R V ROAD BENGALURU – 560 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2 NOTICE TO R-3 D/W) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 29.06.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNX-E TO THE PETITION AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION AND ANNOUNCE THE RESULT ALONG WITH OPTION OF PHOTOCOPY AND REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER SCRIPTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10783 WP No. 22599 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other similar Writ or Order or Direction, directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 29.06.2024 produced at Annexure-E to the petition and permit the petitioner to appear for examination and announce the result along with option of photocopy and revaluation of the Answer scripts. b. Issue such other order or directions as it deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of equity and justice.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and perused the material on record. 3. For the order proposed, notice to respondent No.3 is dispensed with. 4. On 21.08.2024, this Court passed the following interim order: “Sri.B.Ramesh, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. Copies to be served. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10783 WP No. 22599 of 2024 Issue emergent notice to respondent No.3 returnable by 13.09.2024. In the meanwhile, by way of an interim arrangement and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to pay the prescribed Exam fees and appear for Examinations scheduled to be conducted on 22.08.2024 (Mathematics – Paper 7), 23.08.2024 (Mathematics – Paper 8) of 6th semester B.Sc., and 29.08.2024 (Mathematics – Paper 2) of 2nd semester B.Sc., and 30.08.2024 (Mathematics – Paper 4 ) of 4th semester B.Sc., course as per the timetable at Annexure-F, which shall be subject to the final outcome of the writ petition; further, the petitioner shall not claim any equity in this regard. Liberty is reserved in favour of respondents to seek vacation / modification of this order.” 5. Pursuant to the aforesaid interim order dated 21.08.2024, the petitioner took up the aforesaid examinations, but the results are not announced in view of the aforesaid interim order. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present petition stands disposed of directing the respondents to announce the results of the aforesaid examination taken up by the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon the concerned respondents announcing the results of the examination taken up by the petitioner, liberty is reserved in favour of - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:10783 WP No. 22599 of 2024 the respondents to take recourse to such remedies available in law. Hence, nothing further survives in the present petition and the same is disposed of directing the concerned respondents to announce the results of the aforesaid examinations taken up by the petitioner. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be treated as a precedent nor the same shall have any precedential value, for any purpose, whatsoever. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78