IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87148 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Brahamdeo Rai Son of Ramjeevan Rai @ Ramjivan Ray Resident Of Village -Bahrampur, Ps- Rustampur, Diist -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 19-03-2026 No-one appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Raghopur (Rustampur) Police Station Case No. 123 of 2025, disclosing offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35, 25(ix) of the Arms Act. 3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 14.05.2025, during the night, the police party got secret information that on 13.05.2025, the petitioner had forcibly ploughed the disputed land at gunpoint and had also brandished a weapon, a video of which is stated to have gone viral. The police reached at the place of occurrence and recovered one country-made pistol and three live cartridges of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87148 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 8MM K.F from the house of the petitioner. However, the petitioner managed to escape and was not apprehended. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that in the First Information Report and the seizure list, there is specific allegation that the firearm was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The video of the the petitioner brandishing the weapon was also viral. 5. Regards being had to the submissions made by learned counsel for the State and taking into consideration the materials available on record and the fact that illegal firearm has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail, is rejected. Siwani/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T