Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
' APHC010467932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23813 OF 2025 Between: Gubbala Ramanamma, aged 56 years W/o. Late GubbalaAppanna, H.No.19-179, Visakhapatnam. Near New Central Jail Ramakrishnapuram ...Petitioner AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, GVMC Zone-VIII Visakhapatnam District. Vepagunta,
4. Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 5. Baggu Uma K Uma, W/o. BagguHari Krishna, Chinnamushidiwada, Visakhapatnam. H.No.1-14-r-12/4, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the
\ \ \nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not considering the Petitioners representation dated 07.08.2025 in cancelling the building permit order dated 17-03-2022 issued to the 5th Respondent for the land in Sy.No.89/P to an extent of 144 Square yards in Chinnamushidivada village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without there being house *sife patta in favour of the 5th Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, mala-fide arid against the principles of Natural Justice besides violation of Article 14, 21 X:^hd 300- A of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of A.P.Building Rules, 2017 and Consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to Cancel the building permit order dated 17-03-2022 issued to the 5th Respondent for the land in Sy.No.89/P to an extent of 144 Square yards in Chinnamushidivada village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3rdRespondent to consider the Petitioners representation dated 07.08.2025 in cancelling the building permit order dated 17-03-2022 issued to the 5'''^ Respondent for the land in Sy.No.89/P to an extent of 144 Square yards in Chinnamushidivada village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order:
-1- W.P. No.23813 of 2025 Date of order:09.09.2025 APHC010467932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23813/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Gubbala Ramanamma AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1 .THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
-2- / W.P. No.23813 of 2025 ^ Date of order:09.09.202.^^ THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.23813 OF 2025
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authority in considering the representation dated 07.08.2025, whereby the petitioner brought to the notice of the 3'^^ respondent that she has title over a plot admeasuring 144 square yards forms part and parcel of Sy.No.89/P in Chinnamushidivada Village Visakhapatnam District, and seeking cancellation of the building permit
order dated 17.03.2022 issued to the 5*^ respondent on the same Pendurthi Mandal, subject land. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner was granted a house site patta on 14.10.1988 by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Pendurthi. The vendor of the 5^^ respondent was also granted a patta by the Tahsildar of Pendurthi Mandal. A clarification was sought from the Tahsildar, Pendurthi, with regard to the genuineness of patta issued for Plot No.18 in Sy.No.89/P of Chinnamushidivada Village, Pendurthi Mandal. After due enquiry, the Tahsildar informed the 3 ■petitioner’s patta was found in the records of the revenue authority, whereas the patta of the vendor of the 5‘^ respondent was not found in the records. It is submitted that the 5*^ respondent approached the 2 respondent and obtained permission for construction of a house. The 2 rd respondent that the nd nd
\ -3- W.P. No.23813 of 2025 Date of order:09.09.2025 respondent has also accorded permission for construction of a house to the petitioner. 3. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 07.08.2025 requesting the 3^'^ respondent to cancel the permission granted in favour of the 5‘^ respondent, as the 5'^ respondent allegedly purchased the plot from one Smt. P.Nookalu, wife of Muthyalu, whose patta certificate was not found in the revenue records. 4. The learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 submits that both the petitioner and the 5*^ respondent applied for building permission online and that grant of such permission does not confer any ownership rights to either the petitioner or the respondent. 5. Be that as it may, considering the prayer of the petitioner seeking a direction for consideration of her representation and pass necessary orders, this court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition at the stage of admission by directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 07.08.2025 and pass appropriate orders within a period of six (06) weeks after issuing notice to the parties concerned. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. 7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/-G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .J //TRUE COPY// SECTIO^FFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Visakhapatnam. Corporation
V. The Zonal Commissioner, GVMC Zone-VIII Visakhapatnam District. Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. One CC to Sri.
Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Municipal Admn and Urban Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]. One CC to Sri A S C Bose, Advocate [OPUC]. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]. Two CD Copies. 3. Vepagunta,
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. AL
A HIGH COURT TL DATED:09/09/2025
ORDER WP NO. 23813 OF 2025 a 2 3 SEP 2025 )S ^'■^sseauasss^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS