Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31920 (RAJ)

INDUSIND BANK LIMITED v. JAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HERITAGE

CW/16542/2024 · 2025-03-06

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9975] [2025:RJ-JP:9991] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16541/2024 Indusind Bank Limited, Having Its Registered Office 2401, General Thimmayya Road (East Street), Cantonment, Pune- 411011, Maharashtra And One Of Its Branch Office At 1st Floor, B-10, Govind Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Rajapark, Jaipur- 302004, Rajasthan Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Nitesh Laddha. ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Municipal Corporation Greater, Through Its Commissioner, R/o Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302015, Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16542/2024 Indusind Bank Limited, Having Its Registered Office 2401, General Thimmayya Road (East Street), Cantonment, Pune- 411011, Maharashtra And One Of Its Branch Office At 1st Floor, B-10, Govind Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Rajapark, Jaipur- 302004, Rajasthan Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Nitesh Laddha. ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Municipal Corporation Heritage, Through Its Commissioner, R/o Old Police Commissioner Office, Jalebi Chowk, Jaipur- 302002, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Sharma with Ms. Neha Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG assisted by Mr. Manoj Kumar Ms. Swati Thory HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 06/03/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:9975] (2 of 2) [CW-16541/2024] These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents against the demand raised by them towards the advertisement fee within a period of a week from today. 2. The respondents shall decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation vide a reasoned and speaking order with its communication to the petitioner. 3. If the petitioner so desires, it would be given an opportunity of personal hearing. 4. Till decision of the representation, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner for realization of the demand raised. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-190 & 194