1 2025:CGHC:33802 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7240 of 2025 1 - Mohammad Aslam S/o Roshan Mohammad Aged About 54 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School Kaushalpur, Block- Premnagar, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4957333 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ramkumar Kunwar Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School Kaushalpur, Block- Premnagar, District- Surajpur- 4957333 Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Deo Office, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Block- Surajpur District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Block- Surajpur District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 17/07/2025 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:00 +0530 2 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Primary School, Kaushalpur, Block Premnagar to Govt. Primary School, Navapara, Badwar, Block Premnagar, under the rationalization instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok