APHC010468312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION Between: Alagala Devid Blessington Kennedy, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22015/2018 Alagala Devid Blessington Kennedy, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) the following: [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing Proceedings Rc No No 840/ 2018C dated 21 6 2018 as illegal arbitrary unjust contrary to law and also contrary to Section 115 D 2 IV of the A P Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and the Govt Memo No 5825/ Coop III/20147 dated 23 5 2015 issued by the 1st respondent and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same consequently holding that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service till the age of 60 years as per the Resolution of the General Body of the 4th respondent dated 31 3 2018 and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation on behalf of the respondents is in attendance. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that respondent authorities have complied the interim order dated 29.6.2018 and no further orders are required. The petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.3.2024 TJN 182 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22015 OF 2018 Dated: 24.03.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Writ Petition No.22015 of 2018 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03. 24.03.2025 Dr.VJP, J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide Separate Order) _________ Dr.VJP, J TJN