Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31912 (KAR)

SRI D HONNAPPA v. SRI VIJAYA BHASKAR

RFA/2224/2019 · 2025-06-12

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20090 RFA No. 2224 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2224 OF 2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. D.HONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SON OF SRI. G.H.DODDAIH, NO.22, AT STREET, KURUBARAPET, BENGALURU-560 053. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V.B.SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VIJAYA BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF SRI. D.HONNAPPA, NO.22, AT STREET, KURUBARAPET, BENGALURU-560 053. 2. SMT. HEMALATHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. RAVIKUMAR, NO.826, 4TH CROSS, HOSA ROAD, CHENNAKESHAVA NAGAR, SINGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560 068. 3. SMT. MAMATHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI KUMAR, NO.1G, 4TH GALLI, JOGUPALYA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20090 RFA No. 2224 of 2019 HALASURU, BENGALURU. PRESENTLY AT C/O. SRI KUMAR, ADARSH FOODS AND PVT. LTD., 6-3-905, IV FLOOR, SABOO TOWERS, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD-500 082. 4. MS. CHAITANYA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF SRI D. HONNAPPA, NO.22, AT STREET, KURUBARAPET, BENGALURU-560 053. 5. SMT. SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. VIRUPAKSHA, GOREGUNTEPALYA, BENGALURU-560 054. 6. SMT. B.SHANTHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WIFE OF P. BALASUBRAMANIAM, 11TH MILE, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 060. 7. SRI. M.RAJASHEKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SON OF SRI. MARULASIDDAIAH, SOMPURA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 056. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHARA AITHAL.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO 4) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20090 RFA No. 2224 of 2019 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 (1) OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.V.B.Shiva Kumar., counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed on 23.08.2021 stating that the sole appellant died on 16.02.2020. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. Memo is placed on record. A perusal of the same depicts that the sole appellant died back in 2020. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. It's almost five years. The application to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole appellant is not filed. By operation of law, the appeal abates. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32