- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18663 RFA No. 2089 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2089 OF 2016 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. K.VENKATARAMANA SHARMA S/O LATE K.GANAPATHY SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 20TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 041. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGARAJA.S., & SMT. SHOBHA.K.R., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. K. NAGARAJ SHARMA S/O LATE K.GANAPATHY SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.426, 17TH CROSS, 34TH MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. 2. DR. K.K.RATHNA SHARMA D/O LATE K.GANAPATHY SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT AT NO.6824, 163RD AVE, NEW EDMONTON, T5Z 3C6, ALBERTA CANADA, REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI. K.NAGARAJA SHARMA. 3. SMT. PRABHA.S.HEBBAR SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S SRI.SUBRAMANYA HEBBAR, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18663 RFA No. 2089 of 2016 S/O LATE NARYANA HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.2/4, SHANKAR MUTT QUARTERS, SHANKARPURAM, BANGALORE-560 004. 4. SRI. UMASHANKAR S/O LATE K.GANAPATHY SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RA/T NO.13, 20TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 041. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.S.MAHABALESHWARA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the eighth time. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied with. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18663 RFA No. 2089 of 2016 As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2