Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31904 (JHR)

ALOK BAIDYA RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1124/2023 · 2025-04-04

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:10381 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1124 of 2023 ----- Alok Baidya Ray, S/o Late Manoranjan Baidya Ray, resident of Amkura, New Colony, P.O. & P.S. Maithon, District Dhanbad. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anup Purakyastha, Deputy General manager (Administration), Damodar Valley Corporation, Maithon, District Dhanbad. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanket Kumar, Advocate For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate ----- Order No.07 Date: 04.04.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite party no.2 for his wilful and deliberate violation of the order dated 7th September, 2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.2013 of 2022. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 refers to paragraph no.6 of the show cause affidavit dated 27th February, 2025 filed on behalf of said opposite party, which reads as under:- “6. That it is stated and submitted that in compliance of the order dated 07.09.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.2013 of 2022, the office of the answering opposite party after assessment of the dues of the petitioner has released the same to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.62,480/- on 17.01.2025 which also includes interest.” 3. It is, thus, submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has now been complied by the opposite party no.2. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that admissible dues along with interest has already been released in favour of the petitioner, there is no need to further proceed in ( 2025:JHHC:10381 ) 2 the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite partyno.2 is hereby dropped. 5. The present contempt case stands disposed of (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sanjay/