1 APHC010013372017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17875 OF 2017 Between: 1. P.Sreeramulu, S/o P.Hanumanna Aged about 55 years, working as Record Assistant, O/0 Executive Director, District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd, Ananthapuram, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes Co-operative Finance Corporation Ltd, 4th floor, S.P.River view Building, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. District Collector/Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes Co- operative Finance Corporation Ltd, Ananthapuram, Ananthapuram District, A.P. 4. The Executive Director, District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd, Ananthapuram, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue appropriate Writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in issuing the impugned proceedings No. A4 / 80 / APSC / 2017 dated 18-05-2017 as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to their own byelaws and 2 without any power and in violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:CHINTA CHINA SATYANARAYANA ( SC FOR APSCCFC) Counsel for the Respondents:B PRUDHVI KUMAR (SC FOR APSCCFC) Counsel for the Respondents:B PRAKASAM ( SC FOR AP APSCCFC) The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.17875 of 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following main relief: “to issue appropriate Writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in issuing the impugned proceedings No. A4 / 80 / APSC / 2017 dated 18-05-2017 as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to their own byelaws and without any power and in violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and to pass …..” 2. When the matter came up for hearing, Sri P.Venkata Rama Sarma, learned counsel representing Smt.M.Shalini, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.Rathna Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for APSCCFC Limited, appearing for 4th respondent, jointly submit that the petitioner retired from service on 30.06.2022 and as such, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Recording the said submission made by both the counsel, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 01.08.2025 Rns 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.17875 of 2017 Date:01.08.2025 Rns