[2025:RJ-JP:9410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17349/2023 Peetam Singh S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Pasta, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rambabu S/o Late Pooranchand, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 2. Shyambabu S/o Late Pooranchand, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 3. Chandraprakash S/o Late Pooranchand, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 4. Padamchand S/o Late Poranchand, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 5. Santosh Kumar S/o Late Pooranchand, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 6. Tara Devi W/o Late Pooranchand, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 7. Rekha Verma D/o Late Pooranchand W/o Shrikant, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Town Deeg, Presently R/o Khurda, District Buland Shahar. 8. Shashi Soni D/o Late Pooranchand W/o Satish, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Town Deeg Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 9. Ramesh S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Pasta Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. 10. Rameshwar S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Village Pasta, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola For Respondent(s) : Dr. Ram Kumar Sharma Mr. S.L. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order [2025:RJ-JP:9410] (2 of 2) [CW-17349/2023] 04/03/2025 This civil writ petition has been filed by the petitioner- defendant (for short ‘the defendant’) against the order dated 04.09.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, Deeg, District Bharatpur in appeal No. 03/2023 whereby the appeal filed by the respondents-plaintiffs (for short ‘the plaintiffs’) has been partly allowed and the order dated 01.06.2023 passed by the Civil Judge Deeg, District Bharatpur in civil suit No. 24/2023 granting temporary injunction has been modified and direction has been issued to maintain status quo with regard to site and record of the disputed property nor to transfer or mortgage the suit property nor to raise any construction thereon. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the fact that the suit was instituted before the trial Court in the year 2023, without interfering with the impugned order, I dispose of this petition with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit filed by the plaintiffs, if pending with it, preferably within a year, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. Pending application, if any, stand(s) disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Ritu/133