2025:UHC:6419-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No. 57 of 2022 22 July, 2025 Anjana Raturi --Appellant Versus Ajay Raturi --Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Presence:- Mr. D Barthwal, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. (Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) JUDGMENT Appellant/wife has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act challenging judgment dated 13.12.2021 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in O.S. No.404/2016, whereby Suit for divorce filed by husband, was decreed. 2. Today, both the parties are physically present in Court along with their respective counsels. 3. Learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that parties have settled their dispute and the terms of settlement have been reduced into writing in compromise affidavits filed by both husband and wife. 1 2025:UHC:6419-DB 4. As per the terms of compromise enumerated in paragraph no.8 of the affidavit filed by the appellant, respondent/husband would pay a sum of ₹12 lakh to the appellant/wife (Anjana Raturi @ Anjana Bhatt) towards the full and final settlement of all her claims including streedhan, maintenance (present, past and future) and permanent alimony and dowry articles. 5. A bank draft amounting to ₹12 lakh, photocopy whereof is enclosed as Annexure No.1 to the compromise affidavit filed by respondent, was handed over in Court by Mr. Ajay Raturi/respondent to appellant /Anjana Raturi @ Anjana Bhatt. 6. In paragraph no.8 (e) of the affidavit filed by appellant, it is mentioned that custody of daughter Advika Raturi will be with appellant/wife and respondent/husband will not interfere in any manner whatsoever in her upbringing and all the medical responsibilities of the daughter will be taken care of by the appellant/wife. 7. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/wife assures that appellant shall withdraw all criminal cases, instituted by her before different forums. 2 2025:UHC:6419-DB 8. The parties appearing in person before the Court also submitted that since they have decided to part ways and all disputes between them have now been resolved, therefore, this appeal be decided in terms of the compromise. Learned counsel for the parties also made similar submission. 9. In such view of the matter, the first appeal is decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, terms whereof have been enumerated in paragraph no.8 of the affidavit filed by the appellant, which shall be part of the decree. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 22.07.2025 SS 3 SUKHBANT SINGH Digitally signed by SUKHBANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd12 9a8a6380d49b1885e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2 B7D72C42261361AED33172F152148D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH Date: 2025.07.24 11:51:45 +05'30'