Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31886 (CAL)

RAHAMATULLA MIA @ RAHAMATULLA NADAP AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2419/2025 · 2025-08-04

Jay Sengupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

04.08.2025 Court No.28 Item No.36 tbsr Allowed CRM (A) 2419 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with English Bazar P.S. Case No.999 of 2023 dated 29.06.2023 under Sections 448/436/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Rahamatulla Mia @ Rahamatulla Nadap & Ors. ….Petitioners. Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja ….for the petitioners Ms. Sayanti Santra Ms. Debjani Sahu ….for the State Heard the learned counsels for the parties. Perused the case diary. Considering the fact that substantially similarly circumstanced co-accused was granted anticipatory bail before this Court on 18.02.2025 in CRM (A) 531 of 2025 and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioners shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses, shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court and pray 2 for bail within four weeks from this date and shall attend the jurisdictional Court regularly. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for. (Jay Sengupta, J.)