1 (WPS No. 4965 of 2015) 2025:CGHC:5350 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4965 of 2015 1 - Pradeep Kumar Banerjee S/o S.K. Banerjee, Aged About 54 Years Executive Engineer In The O/o Chief Engineer, P W D, Bilaspur Zone, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Deputy Secretary, Law And Legislative Affairs Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Engineer- In- Chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Near Akashwani, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Zone, Opp. District Court, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Circle, Opp. District Court, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Building/ Road Division 1, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Mr. Sunil Kumar Soni, Advocate For State :- Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29.01.2025 1. Heard. ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.02.03 12:18:33 +0530 2 (WPS No. 4965 of 2015) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner worked as Sub-Divisional Officer, PWD, High Court Sub-Division, Bilaspur and the office register of Misc. Public Works Advance (Annexure P/11) placed an amount of Rs. 3,07,57,774/- made recoverable from the petitioner, against which he has made representations before respondent No.6/competent authority, which have not been considered and decided till date. 3. Be that as it may, respondent No.6/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of this order. Further, the petitioner is also at liberty to file additional representation along with relevant documents within four weeks from today before the respondent/competent authority for redressal of his grievance. 4. With the aforesaid directions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!