Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31879 (AP)

GUDIPADARA RUKUMANDHAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/24891/2025 · 2025-09-15

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010466792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24891 of 2025 Between: 1. GUDIPADARA RUKUMANDHAR, S/O. GUDIPADARA BENU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. 1-254, SASANAM VILLAGE, KANCHILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (SCHOOL EDUCATION), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CONVENER AP MEGA DSC, NEW GOVERNMENT OFFICES BUILDING VIDYA BHAVAN, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR SERVICES II THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24891 of 2025 ORDER:- In the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner is questioning the correctness of the answer key with respect to Question Id’s – 39226623695, 39226623607 and 39226623579 which was issued pursuant to Notification No.1/Mega-DSC- TRC-1/2025, dated 20.04.2025. 2. The Petitioner contends that the academic literature of these questions is contrary to the answer key provided by the respondents. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education would submit that the answer key was issued after consultation with experts and no interference is called for. 4. Considering the submissions made, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions: a) The Petitioner shall submit a representation to the respondents enclosing the supporting academic literature to Question Id’s – 39226623695, 39226623607 and 39226623579. b) Upon receipt of the said representation, the respondents shall examine it along with the enclosed academic literature, consider its feasibility, and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 16.09.2025 KK