Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7096 CRL.A No. 1172 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1172 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
SRI. ASHOK KUMAR S/O BEEREGHOWDA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT DODDAMARAGOWDANAHALLI MYSORE TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RANJITH K.S, ADVOCATE – [ABSENT]) AND:
1.
SRI. MAHADEVA S/O NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2.
SMT. HUCHCHAMMA W/O NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT DADADAHALLY VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK
3.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY MYSORE SOUTH POLICE STATION …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1L V/O DT.20.12.2023 APPEAL AGAINST R2 STANDS ABATED)
Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7096 CRL.A No. 1172 of 2013
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S. 372 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:31.07.2013 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. S.J., MYSORE IN S.C.NO.168/10 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498(A) AND 306 OF IPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant’s side. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 20.12.2023, 14.06.2024, 09.08.2024 and 28.01.2025.
Considering the above aspect, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52